I am a medical researcher who writes a papers with a lot of references at the end.One of the problems with the EPOC Word program is lack of autonumbered end-noting and footnoting. I have found a work-around, and it actually works better that MS Word in the sense that many medical journals insist on electronic submissions to be basically text files without foot/endnoting, so everything has to be typed out anyway.
I have set up a Data file with a single data field labeled " " of the text field type with 250 characters. This allows the references to be viewed without a space wasting label field. My references are then input or imported from previously created bibliographies, eg:
Biggle FS, Hodown QT, Bigbotham OK. Systemic 4-323KX expression in the non-zipped wombat model of coronary atherosclerosis. Obscurity 1993;23:14-23.
As you write your paper in Word, you slip in the reference as "[number]" which is what the journals want any way, and you place that number in front of the Data entry corresponding to that reference. eg,
In Word:
....In 1993, Biggle and associates in their landmark paper on the wombat model of coronary atherosclerosis [8], remarked...
In Data:
8. Biggle FS, Hodown QT, Bigbotham OK. Systemic 4-323KX expression in the non-zipped wombat model of coronary atherosclerosis. Obscurity 1993;23:14-23.
Then you sort the database. If you revise the paper, and the numbering gets redone, it's simply a matter of renumbering the paper first and then the references, then resort.
When you're ready to make a final draft and insert your references, your Export as text from Data. All the references come out in a text file with quotation limiting marks.
You can then import this into your paper in Word and do a find and replace of all the quotation marks. It results in a formatted, numbered endnote section.
Not the greatest, but until they update EPOC OS to do autonumbering, the most workable solution.
_NW.gif/32363637336631303438396239373430)
_NW.gif/32363637336631303438396239373430?_RM_EMPTY_){kind=small}